On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 03:29:10PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 12:13:03PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> More people have reported they need this for their machines to work >> >> correctly. >> > >> > Can you add a comment to each indicating why they're being added so we >> > can easily remove them again once the problem is fixed? >> >> Because that's what users report: >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60682 > > Yes. For each entry, add a comment describing the specific bug seen. In case you didn't hear, the plan was to add an entry if a user reports the backlight not working correctly, and acpi_osi="!Windows 2012" fixing it with no negative effects. and that's what users did in bug #60682. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
