On Tue Aug 20 13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 19, 2013 04:35:29 PM Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > On Tue Aug 20 13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, August 19, 2013 09:16:14 AM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 06:26:35PM -0700, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > > > Without MODULE_LICENSE set, I get the following with modprobe:
> > > > >
> > > > > acpi_i2c: module license 'unspecified' taints kernel.
> > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol i2c_new_device (err 0)
> > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_get_resources (err 0)
> > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_resource_interrupt (err 0)
> > > > > acpi_i2c: Unknown symbol acpi_dev_free_resource_list (err 0)
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jerry.snitselaar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Looks good to me.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Mika Westerbeg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Well, OK, but do we need to be able to build that as a module?
> > >
> > > Maybe it should just be yes or no?
> > >
> > > Rafael
> > >
> >
> > Perhaps have depends on I2C=y and be a bool instead of tristate?
>
> Yes, that's the idea.
>
Does this look okay Mika?
[PATCH] acpi_i2c: do not build as loadable module
Change from tristate to bool, and depend on I2C=y
Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jerry.snitselaar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 100bd72..183a309 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -181,8 +181,9 @@ config ACPI_DOCK
drive bays such as the IBM Ultrabay and the Dell Module Bay.
config ACPI_I2C
- def_tristate I2C
- depends on I2C
+ bool "I2C"
+ depends on I2C=y
+ default n
help
ACPI I2C enumeration support.
--
1.8.4.rc3.2.g2c2b664
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
