On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 02:15 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, August 05, 2013 05:19:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > : > > > Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it somewhat, but since the > > > greatest number of physical nodes per ACPI device object I can get on my test > > > machines is 2 (and even that after hacking the kernel somewhat), that was kind > > > of unconclusive. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Rafael > > > > > > > > > --- > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Subject: ACPI: Drop physical_node_id_bitmap from struct acpi_device > > > > > > The physical_node_id_bitmap in struct acpi_device is only used for > > > looking up the first currently unused phyiscal dependent node ID > > > by acpi_bind_one(). It is not really necessary, however, because > > > acpi_bind_one() walks the entire physical_node_list of the given > > > device object for sanity checking anyway and if that list is always > > > sorted by node_id, it is straightforward to find the first gap > > > between the currently used node IDs and use that number as the ID > > > of the new list node. > > > > > > This also removes the artificial limit of the maximum number of > > > dependent physical devices per ACPI device object, which now depends > > > only on the capacity of unsigend int. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > I like the change. Much better :-) > > > > Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> > > However, it introduces a bug in acpi_unbind_one(), because the size of the name > array in there has to be increased too. Updated patch follows. Right. Sorry, I overlooked this one. Please apply my ask to this new version. Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
