On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 15:14 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: : > Can you please test the appended patch? I tested it somewhat, but since the > greatest number of physical nodes per ACPI device object I can get on my test > machines is 2 (and even that after hacking the kernel somewhat), that was kind > of unconclusive. > > Thanks, > Rafael > > > --- > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: ACPI: Drop physical_node_id_bitmap from struct acpi_device > > The physical_node_id_bitmap in struct acpi_device is only used for > looking up the first currently unused phyiscal dependent node ID > by acpi_bind_one(). It is not really necessary, however, because > acpi_bind_one() walks the entire physical_node_list of the given > device object for sanity checking anyway and if that list is always > sorted by node_id, it is straightforward to find the first gap > between the currently used node IDs and use that number as the ID > of the new list node. > > This also removes the artificial limit of the maximum number of > dependent physical devices per ACPI device object, which now depends > only on the capacity of unsigend int. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> I like the change. Much better :-) Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx> Thanks, -Toshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
