On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Saturday, August 03, 2013 03:24:16 PM Felipe Contreras wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Saturday, August 03, 2013 04:14:04 PM Aaron Lu wrote: >> >> >> Yes, the patch is correct, but I still prefer my own version :-) >> >> https://github.com/aaronlu/linux/commit/0a3d2c5b59caf80ae5bb1ca1fda0f7bf448b38c9 >> >> >> >> In case you want to take mine and mine needs refresh, please let me know >> >> and I can do the re-base, thanks. >> > >> > Well, I prefer simpler, unless there's a good reason to use more complicated. >> >> Note that these are not exclusionary; his patch can be applied on top >> of mine. I don't think his patch is needed though. > > OK > > Do we still need to revert commit efaa14c if this patch is applied? I guess not. At least in this machine changing the backlight works correctly, whereas in v3.11-rc3 it was all weird, and v3.7-v3.10 didn't work at all. I cannot see how it would affect negatively other machines. That being said, the blacklisting is still needed, because 1. the level is not preserved between boots, and 2. level 0 turns off the screen, which I personally consider a regression. At least it boots to level 100 instead of 0. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
