On Sunday, July 14, 2013 10:08:28 AM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:47:26PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, July 13, 2013 08:09:59 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > Now that acpiphp_check_bridge() always enumerates devices behind the > > > bridge, there is no need to do that for each sub-bridge anymore like it is > > > done in the current ACPI-based PCI hotplug code. Given this we don't need > > > check_sub_bridges() anymore and can drop the function completely. > > > > > > This also simplifies the ACPIPHP code a bit. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > This applies on top of v3.10 with Rafael's ACPIPHP + Thunderbolt series > > > applied: > > > > > > > OK, I added it to my bleeding-edge branch along with this series: > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-acpi/msg44480.html > > > > rebased on top of some previous ACPI cleanup commits. I needed to make some > > changes in the process (and fixed up some breakage reported by the auto build > > testing), hopefully I didn't break anything. If you're in an adventurous mood, > > testing would be welcome. ;-) [That already includes the majority of 3.11 > > material from Linus, though, so unexpected breakage elsewhere may happen.] > > Tried the bleeding-edge branch on both of our test machines and Thunderbolt > still works fine. Awesome! :-) Thanks a lot for testing. If Bjorn doesn't hate it, I'll put the series into linux-next after 3.11-rc1 is released. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
