Re: [regression,bisected] restore of disks after suspend-to-disk broken in 3.9.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2013/6/21 Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 13:23 +0000, Zhang, Rui wrote:
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Giacomo Perale [mailto:giacomo.perale@xxxxxxxxx]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 5:09 PM
>> > To: Zhang, Rui
>> > Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rafael J.
>> > Wysocki
>> > Subject: Re: [regression,bisected] restore of disks after suspend-to-
>> > disk broken in 3.9.x
>> > Importance: High
>> >
>> > 2013/5/30 Giacomo Perale <giacomo.perale@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > > 2013/5/30 Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > >> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 10:04 +0200, Giacomo Perale wrote:
>> > >>> 2013/5/30 Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > >>> > On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 22:07 +0200, Giacomo Perale wrote:
>> > >>> >> 2013/5/27 Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > >>> >> > On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 15:51 +0200, Giacomo Perale wrote:
>> > >>> >> >> Hello,
>> > >>> >> >>
>> > >>> >> >> after upgrading from 3.8.7 to 3.9.x I noticed some slightly
>> > >>> >> >> longer delays when resuming from suspend-to-disk and a few
>> > new
>> > >>> >> >> error messages in the logs:
>> > >>> >> >>
>> > >>> >> >>
>> > >>> >> >> Not having connected the issue with the previous error
>> > >>> >> >> messages I initially blamed the disk and replaced it with a
>> > >>> >> >> new one thinking it was broken, but the problem persisted so
>> > I
>> > >>> >> >> started a bisection run that pointed to this commit:
>> > >>> >> >>
>> > >>> >> >>
>> > >>> >> > I do not see how this would affect the sata hibernation/resume.
>> > >>> >> > but anyway, would you please try the four patches in comment
>> > >>> >> > #10, #11,
>> > >>> >> > #12 and #13 in
>> > >>> >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58301
>> > >>> >> > and check if they help?
>> > >>> >> >
>> > >>> >> > thanks,
>> > >>> >> > rui
>> > >>> >> >
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> >> No luck, with git head and those four patches hibernation is
>> > >>> >> completely broken, the system doesn't even shut down, it just
>> > >>> >> loses the disks (I'm attaching what I could get from /proc/kmsg
>> > >>> >> to this email).
>> > >>> >>
>> > >>> > then can you please try the patch at
>> > >>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2633071/
>> > >>> > on top of the four patches and see if it helps?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > thanks,
>> > >>> > rui
>> > >>> >
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Do you mean without Rafael's patch?
>> > >>>
>> > >> right.
>> > >>
>> > >> thanks,
>> > >> rui
>> > >
>> > > [cc-ing list]
>> > >
>> > > No difference, system doesn't shut down and disks become unavailable.
>> > >
>> > > Giacomo
>> >
>> > Any news about this?
>> >
>>
>> I'm proposing a new patch set based on the problem found by Rafael's patch.
>> And I'll send them out in a day or two, please wait for the update. :)
>>
> sorry for the late response.
>
> can you please check if the patch series at
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2733361/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2733371/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2733391/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2733401/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2733411/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2733421/
> helps or not?
>
> thanks,
> rui
>
>> Thanks,
>> rui
>>
>>
>> > Thanks.

Are those patches already in git head or do I need to apply them separately?

Thanks

Giacomo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux