RE: [regression,bisected] restore of disks after suspend-to-disk broken in 3.9.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giacomo Perale [mailto:giacomo.perale@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 5:09 PM
> To: Zhang, Rui
> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rafael J.
> Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [regression,bisected] restore of disks after suspend-to-
> disk broken in 3.9.x
> Importance: High
> 
> 2013/5/30 Giacomo Perale <giacomo.perale@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > 2013/5/30 Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 10:04 +0200, Giacomo Perale wrote:
> >>> 2013/5/30 Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>> > On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 22:07 +0200, Giacomo Perale wrote:
> >>> >> 2013/5/27 Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>> >> > On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 15:51 +0200, Giacomo Perale wrote:
> >>> >> >> Hello,
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> after upgrading from 3.8.7 to 3.9.x I noticed some slightly
> >>> >> >> longer delays when resuming from suspend-to-disk and a few
> new
> >>> >> >> error messages in the logs:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Not having connected the issue with the previous error
> >>> >> >> messages I initially blamed the disk and replaced it with a
> >>> >> >> new one thinking it was broken, but the problem persisted so
> I
> >>> >> >> started a bisection run that pointed to this commit:
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> > I do not see how this would affect the sata hibernation/resume.
> >>> >> > but anyway, would you please try the four patches in comment
> >>> >> > #10, #11,
> >>> >> > #12 and #13 in
> >>> >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58301
> >>> >> > and check if they help?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > thanks,
> >>> >> > rui
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >> No luck, with git head and those four patches hibernation is
> >>> >> completely broken, the system doesn't even shut down, it just
> >>> >> loses the disks (I'm attaching what I could get from /proc/kmsg
> >>> >> to this email).
> >>> >>
> >>> > then can you please try the patch at
> >>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2633071/
> >>> > on top of the four patches and see if it helps?
> >>> >
> >>> > thanks,
> >>> > rui
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> Do you mean without Rafael's patch?
> >>>
> >> right.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> rui
> >
> > [cc-ing list]
> >
> > No difference, system doesn't shut down and disks become unavailable.
> >
> > Giacomo
> 
> Any news about this?
> 

I'm proposing a new patch set based on the problem found by Rafael's patch.
And I'll send them out in a day or two, please wait for the update. :)

Thanks,
rui


> Thanks.
> 
> Giacomo
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f





[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux