Re: [PATCH 03/16] ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in.
> This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan.
> ACPICA bugzilla 997.

So what is the new format?
Looks like a blank line after every "case", except no blank line if comment?

That would be a good thing to say in the commit message...

Also, for patches such as this, please note in the commit message
that it is white-space only (indeed, in this case looks like blank lines only)
and no functionality changes.

That would help optimize precious reviewer time,
and also make it clear to those doing a bisect who
read only the commit message and not the patch.

thanks,
Len Brown
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux