>>> On 11.03.13 at 14:53, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:32:17PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 11.03.13 at 14:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Could the commit should also mention what version of the Xen hypervisor >> > supports this new flag and takes action on it? >> >> Do you really think this is needed? I generally try to stay away >> from doing such, since backports can easily invalidate such >> statements. > > Perhaps just mention the title of the patch in the Xen tree? Okay, will send you a v2 with the hypervisor size change referenced. Sigh. >> > Besides that little nit-pick it looks OK to me. Are there any changes >> > neccessary on the IA64 or ARM side for this? >> >> Xen on IA64 is dead, so I don't see any need for further action > > You are touching generic ACPI code. My question was in terms of > the Linux ACPI IA64 code. The changes there are completely benign to IA64. Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
