On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 01:32:17PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 11.03.13 at 14:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Could the commit should also mention what version of the Xen hypervisor > > supports this new flag and takes action on it? > > Do you really think this is needed? I generally try to stay away > from doing such, since backports can easily invalidate such > statements. Perhaps just mention the title of the patch in the Xen tree? > > > Besides that little nit-pick it looks OK to me. Are there any changes > > neccessary on the IA64 or ARM side for this? > > Xen on IA64 is dead, so I don't see any need for further action You are touching generic ACPI code. My question was in terms of the Linux ACPI IA64 code. > there. And I don't think ARM has any ACPI enablement so far (on > the Xen side at least). And also on the Linux side by just doing a quick grep. Surely that will change at some point. > > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
