> While I appreciate your confidence, I don't notice quite a few new > warnings (because there are so many of them already :-(). Is there some > reason to not turn this on in our "normal" builds? Does it produce many > false positives? What compiler version is required? I've not seen any false positives from it yet. Unlike some of the variable related ones it seems pretty solid. > I also currently don't carry patches that only ever appear in linux-next > (well, not intentionally anyway). I assume it would require a patch to > the Makefile(s) to turn this on. Yes. I guess it belongs to the build scripts maintainers ? Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
