On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 06:27:50 PM Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > Dne 28.11.2012 18:02, Linus Torvalds napsal(a): > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> I've opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51071 > >> and attached picture there which is all I have. I wonder if you can try to apply the patch below and see if that makes any difference? Rafael --- drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) Index: linux/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c +++ linux/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c @@ -610,6 +610,14 @@ int pnpacpi_build_resource_template(stru struct acpi_resource *resource; int res_cnt = 0; acpi_status status; + int ret; + + /* Sanity check. */ + ret = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev); + if (ret) { + dev_err(&dev->dev, "ACPI node is invalid in %s\n", __func__); + return ret; + } status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, pnpacpi_count_resources, &res_cnt); -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
