> > This patch will not affect the generated vmlinux binary. > > If this is the goal, then please VERIFY that the goal was met by building both > ways and comparing the kernel. It's not the goal of this patch, it should be better stated as no function changes. > due to the hunk below, we know that this patch DOES change the kernel, and > not in a correct way: > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c > > b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c index 285e24b..b4469a6 > > 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c > > @@ -384,10 +384,6 @@ void acpi_tb_check_dsdt_header(void) > > acpi_tb_print_table_header(0, &acpi_gbl_original_dsdt_header); > > acpi_tb_print_table_header(0, acpi_gbl_DSDT); > > > > - ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, > > - "Please send DMI info to linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\n" > > - "If system does not work as expected, please boot with > acpi=copy_dsdt")); > > - > > /* Disable further error messages */ > > Please retain this difference between Linux and ACPICA -- it is there for a > reason. Agreed. I shouldn't make this vanished. I will add this back to Linux during the next release if this is needed. Best regards/Lv Zheng > thanks, > -Len > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
