Hi Rafael,
2012/11/16 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, November 16, 2012 10:07:49 AM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Rafael,
2012/11/16 9:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 02:59:30 PM Wen Congyang wrote:
The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove() will be called.
acpi_memory_device_remove() will also be called when we unbind the
memory device from the driver acpi_memhotplug or a driver initialization
fails.
acpi_memory_disable_device() has already implemented a code which
offlines memory and releases acpi_memory_info struct . But
acpi_memory_device_remove() has not implemented it yet.
So the patch prepares the framework for hot removing memory and
adds the framework into acpi_memory_device_remove().
We may hotremove the memory device by this 2 ways at the same time.
So we remove the function acpi_memory_disable_device(), and use
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() which is used by 2nd case to implement it.
We lock device in acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), so there is no
need to add lock in acpi_memhotplug.
The last version of this patchset is here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/8/121
Note:
1. The following commit in pm tree can be dropped now(The other two patches
are already dropped):
54c4c7db6cb94d7d1217df6d7fca6847c61744ab
2. This patchset requires the following patch(It is in pm tree now)
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/1/225
Changes from v4 to v5:
1. patch2: new patch. use acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() to implement memory
device hotremove.
Changes from v3 to v4:
1. patch1: unlock list_lock when removing memory fails.
2. patch2: just rebase them
3. patch3-7: these patches are in -mm tree, and they conflict with this
patchset, so Adrew Morton drop them from -mm tree. I rebase and merge
them into this patchset.
Wen Congyang (6):
acpi,memory-hotplug: deal with eject request in hotplug queue
acpi_memhotplug.c: fix memory leak when memory device is unbound from
the module acpi_memhotplug
acpi_memhotplug.c: free memory device if acpi_memory_enable_device()
failed
acpi_memhotplug.c: don't allow to eject the memory device if it is
being used
acpi_memhotplug.c: bind the memory device when the driver is being
loaded
acpi_memhotplug.c: auto bind the memory device which is hotplugged
before the driver is loaded
Yasuaki Ishimatsu (1):
acpi,memory-hotplug : add memory offline code to
acpi_memory_device_remove()
Well, I have tried _really_ hard to apply this patchset, but pretty much
none of the patches except for [1/7] applied for me. I have no idea what
tree they are against, but I'm pretty sure it's not my tree.
I _have_ applied patches [1-4/7] and pushed them to linux-pm.git/linux-next.
I checked your tree and found a mistake.
You merged a following patch into your tree.
commitid:2ba281f1
ACPI / memory-hotplug: introduce a mutex lock to protect the list
in acpi_memory_device
But it is wrong.
[1/7] patch is "acpi,memory-hotplug : add memory offline code to
acpi_memory_device_remove()". So we would like you to merge it
instead of commitid:2ba281f1.
Yes, I've found it too.
Now applied patches [1-6/7], because I agree with Toshi Kani that patch [7/7]
goes too far, so I'm not going to apply it.
I confirmed that patches were merged into your tree correctly.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
