On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:28:50PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 05:18:13 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:15:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Could we change this so that you can pass NULL list as well (provided that > > > > the preproc is given)? > > > > > > > > This is useful in case when we try to find the SPI/I2C device handle based > > > > on the ACPI serial bus resource address. In that case we are not interested > > > > in any other resources (and hence there is no need to allocate memory for > > > > them etc.) > > > > > > I'd prefer to have a separate helper function for that, if that's not a > > > problem. It should be clear when we ask for resources of a given device > > > and when we only want to poke things like that. > > > > It's not a problem, we can have a separate helper for that. > > OK > > I suppose you can introduce such a helper in the GPIO patch, then? :-) Actually we don't need that at all - we just need to return 1 from the preproc function and acpi_dev_get_resources() will skip creating the normal resources (altough we still need to pass valid resource_list but that is not a problem). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
