On Tuesday, November 13, 2012 05:18:13 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 04:15:51PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Could we change this so that you can pass NULL list as well (provided that > > > the preproc is given)? > > > > > > This is useful in case when we try to find the SPI/I2C device handle based > > > on the ACPI serial bus resource address. In that case we are not interested > > > in any other resources (and hence there is no need to allocate memory for > > > them etc.) > > > > I'd prefer to have a separate helper function for that, if that's not a > > problem. It should be clear when we ask for resources of a given device > > and when we only want to poke things like that. > > It's not a problem, we can have a separate helper for that. OK I suppose you can introduce such a helper in the GPIO patch, then? :-) Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
