On Monday, November 05, 2012 02:11:03 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Monday, November 05, 2012 02:14:21 PM Mathias Nyman wrote: > > >> per-chip based numbering sounds saner, but this deals with what we > >> currently have. > > > > And we need something to hook up drivers to right now. > > So speaking of it I have these drivers consuming pinctrl that I need > to hook up right now and the subsystem maintainers are NACKing > the patches because they want a centralized solution instead of > per-driver hooks and I get the red light... > > Do you think they will change their mind and give me green light if > I tell them I just need to do it right now? ;-) Well, it's just a matter of fairness to me, actually. If you allowed somebody to do something in the past, it's simply unfair to forbid someone else to do a similar thing later, isn't it? Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
