On Monday, November 05, 2012 02:14:21 PM Mathias Nyman wrote: > On 11/05/2012 01:53 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Mika Westerberg > > <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> +/** > >> + * acpi_get_gpio() - Translate ACPI GPIO pin to GPIO number usable with GPIO API > >> + * @path: ACPI GPIO controller full path name, (e.g. "\\_SB.GPO1") > >> + * @pin: ACPI GPIO pin number (0-based, controller-relative) > >> + * > >> + * Returns GPIO number to use with Linux generic GPIO API, or errno error value > >> + */ > > > > So by just looking at that we can see that this is yet another > > instance of papering > > over the fact that the Linux GPIO numbers are global to the kernel and not > > per-chip, as would be preferred. > > Yes, it is. ACPI5 GPIO resources are numbered per-chip. This is just a > way for device drivers to find the corresponding Linux GPIO. > > per-chip based numbering sounds saner, but this deals with what we > currently have. And we need something to hook up drivers to right now. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
