Re: [RFC] ACPI S3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!).

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm not sure it matters, but I'm testing against a changeset about a week old:
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=1c4a5b37b55c56e49135e65728137f54288d1fe6

Plus patches specific to XenClient Enterprise.


On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:46:09PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> > The end result is this is a nice set of patches where there is only
>> > _one_ change in the x86 code (and it is just more of dealing with
>> > error case) - and the rest are all done in Xen side.
>>
>> I'm sorry to report that this series doesn't seem to work in my setup
>> against xen-unstable.
>>
>> To verify that it was, in fact this patch series, and not another Xen
>> regression - I swapped out the kernel with this patch series, with an
>> identical one, replacing only this series with your acpi-s3.v9 branch
>> - and everything worked fine.
>
> Thanks for testing it!
>
> I had tested it with Xen 4.1.3, which could be doing something different.
> Will see what is up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux