On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 01:46:09PM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] > > > The end result is this is a nice set of patches where there is only > > _one_ change in the x86 code (and it is just more of dealing with > > error case) - and the rest are all done in Xen side. > > I'm sorry to report that this series doesn't seem to work in my setup > against xen-unstable. > > To verify that it was, in fact this patch series, and not another Xen > regression - I swapped out the kernel with this patch series, with an > identical one, replacing only this series with your acpi-s3.v9 branch > - and everything worked fine. Thanks for testing it! I had tested it with Xen 4.1.3, which could be doing something different. Will see what is up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
