Hi All, On Friday 28 of September 2012 23:51:10 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The following patch series extends the existing device PM QoS core code to > support PM QoS flags representing binary (on/off) requirements, such as > whether or not power may be removed entirely from the device or whether > or not remote wakeup (i.e. signalling of external events while suspended) > should work for it. > > [1/7] Prepare PM QoS device structure for adding more constraint types. > [2/7] Introduce request and constraint data types for PM QoS flags. > [3/7] Prepare struct dev_pm_qos_request for representing more request types. > [4/7] Introduce device PM QoS flags support. > [5/7] Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user space. > [6/7] PM / Domains: Check device PM QoS flags in pm_genpd_poweroff(). > [7/7] PM / ACPI: Take device PM QoS flags into account. > > The last two patches make the generic PM domains framework and ACPI / PCI, > respectively, take the PM QoS device flags introduced by patch [5/7] into > accont when making their decisions. > > The changelogs describe the details, but if anything isn't clear, please let > me know. Time for a real submission, it seems. :-) The changes since the previous iteration are addressed comments and a small optimization in patch [5/7] (it won't resume the device if the setting is not going to change in dev_pm_qos_update_flags()). Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
