On Monday 01 of October 2012 18:17:10 Pihet-XID, Jean wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > The following patch series extends the existing device PM QoS core code to > > support PM QoS flags representing binary (on/off) requirements, such as > > whether or not power may be removed entirely from the device or whether > > or not remote wakeup (i.e. signalling of external events while suspended) > > should work for it. > > > > [1/7] Prepare PM QoS device structure for adding more constraint types. > > [2/7] Introduce request and constraint data types for PM QoS flags. > > [3/7] Prepare struct dev_pm_qos_request for representing more request types. > > [4/7] Introduce device PM QoS flags support. > > [5/7] Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user space. > > [6/7] PM / Domains: Check device PM QoS flags in pm_genpd_poweroff(). > > [7/7] PM / ACPI: Take device PM QoS flags into account. > > > > The last two patches make the generic PM domains framework and ACPI / PCI, > > respectively, take the PM QoS device flags introduced by patch [5/7] into > > accont when making their decisions. > > > > The changelogs describe the details, but if anything isn't clear, please let > > me know. > That looks OK after review. FWIW: > Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@xxxxxx> Thanks! Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
