On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 09:01:02PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> If CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP is unset, the compiler complains that
> pwr_btn_event_pending is defined but not used. To silence the
> warning, move the definition of pwr_btn_event_pending under an
> appropriate #ifdef.
>
> Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(gts, "Enable evaluation
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(bfs, "Enable evaluation of _BFS on resume".);
>
> static u8 sleep_states[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT];
> -static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
>
> static void acpi_sleep_tts_switch(u32 acpi_state)
> {
> @@ -110,6 +109,7 @@ static int acpi_sleep_prepare(u32 acpi_s
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP
> static u32 acpi_target_sleep_state = ACPI_STATE_S0;
> +static bool pwr_btn_event_pending;
>
> /*
> * The ACPI specification wants us to save NVS memory regions during hibernation
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
