Hi Daniel, On Friday 06 July 2012 04:28 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The main purpose of all these cleanup patches are to move out all non-data information from the cpuidle_state structure in order to add a new api which could be 'cpuidle_register_cpu_latency(int cpu, struct cpuidle_latencies latencies)'.
So are there any technical difficulties in adding such an api with the non-data information being part of cpuidle_state? Or its just that you think the already duplicated non-data information (per state) is going to be duplicated much more (per state per cpu) in most cases. regards, Rajendra -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
