On Thursday, July 05, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > We have the state index passed as parameter to the 'enter' function. > Most of the drivers assign their 'enter' functions several times in > the cpuidle_state structure, as we have the index, we can delegate > to the driver to handle their own callback array. > > That will have the benefit of removing multiple lines of code in the > different drivers. Hmm. I suppose the cpuidle subsystem was designed the way it was for a reason. Among other things, this was to avoid recurrence in callbacks - please see acpi_idle_enter_bm() for example. Now, if .enter() is moved to the driver structure, it will have to be an all-purpose complicated routine calling itself recursively at least in some cases. I'm not quite convinced that would be an improvement. On the other hand, I don't see anything wrong with setting several callback pointers to the same routine. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
