On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:53:49 +0100, Michael Zintakis wrote: > In the meantime, considering the specifics of my particular case and the > memory regions involved (again, I think they are 0x290-0x297, a total of > 8 bytes in length according to the driver, though if someone more > knowledgeable in the f71882fg driver specifics know otherwise, please > feel free to correct this if that assumption is wrong), would it be > possible to manually hack into the ACPI code and forcefully prevent it > from claiming those memory regions and not get involved in "managing" > that particular device? Not that I know of. That would rather be a question for the ACPI people, but I'm afraid the answer is that ACPI is supposed to be the best thing since sliced bread and you should just let it do its stuff and not ask questions :( I too would love to be able to tell ACPI to let my hardware monitoring chip (and/or SMBus controller) alone. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
