On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 09:15:37PM +0800, Lin Ming wrote: > >> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > >> > index 7417267..734d946 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c > >> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > >> > @@ -908,6 +908,10 @@ static int acpi_bus_get_power_flags(struct acpi_device *device) > >> > device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D3].flags.valid = 1; > >> > device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D3].power = 0; > >> > > >> > + /* Also set D3cold's explicit flag when _PS3 exists */ > >> > + if (device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT].flags.explicit_set) > >> > + device->power.states[ACPI_STATE_D3].flags.explicit_set = 1; > >> > >> We should use ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD instead of ACPI_STATE_D3 to make thing > >> clear. > >> > > Thanks for your suggestion. > > > > Well, considering all those ACPI_STATE_D3 used in tree, I don't think I > > should use ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD here, especially the two lines above are > > still using ACPI_STATE_D3. > > > > But if that is desired, we should probably change all the existing > > ACPI_STATE_D3 macros to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD to make things clear. > > > > Or we all use ACPI_STATE_D3, since it is defined as 4 and means D3 cold, > > and people will learn this, won't they? > > > > What do you think? > > OK. > > But we may do more cleanup later. > Sure :-) I think the first thing to do is to agree on which macro should be used, ACPI_STATE_D3 or ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD. And then replace the other one altogether. Thanks, Aaron -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html