On 03/05/2012 04:03 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, February 28, 2012, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: >> acpi_cpu_soft_notify handles only CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DEAD events. However, >> during a system-wide suspend/hibernation operation, CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN and >> CPU_DEAD_FROZEN events are sent as part of CPU hotplug. >> >> Those events are really no different from regular CPU hotplug in this context, >> and hence acpi shouldn't ignore them. So, teach acpi_cpu_soft_notify() to >> handle those events as well. >> >> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> I am no ACPI expert! So requesting a thorough review of this patch.. > > Well, as far as I can tell, it _looks_ correct. That said, I don't think > anyone will really tell you on the basis of code review alone, this requires > testing. > > Since Len hasn't been very responsive recently, I can take this patch into > linux-pm/linux-next and see what the feedback is. That would be great! Thanks a lot! Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
