RE: [PATCH 2/2] ACPICA: support Generic Address Structure bit_offset in acpi_read/write

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 01:35 +0800, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> That doesn't deal with long-lived mappings and changes that I just
> >> mentioned in last e-mail - but it does mean that callers of ioremap()
> >> don't need to worry ... they can call "blindly".
> >
> > I see.  So you think it is better to enclose page_is_ram() with #ifndef
> > CONFIG_IA64 in the patch, so that only ioremap() is used?
> 
> Functionally yes - though the aversion to #ifdef in the middle of code
> would imply some extra hoops.  Perhaps
> 
> #ifndef CONFIG_IA64
> #define can_use_kmap(pfn) page_is_ram(pfn)
> #else
> #define can_use_kmap(pfn) (0) /* ioremap() will take care of cache attributes */
> #endif
> 
> 
> ...
> 
> 		if (can_use_kmap(pfn)) {

Yes.  That is better.  I will do that.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux