>Well, how about using separate (independent lock) for sysfs_remove_battery() >case? Since we can't safely drop battery->lock in sysfs_remove_battery() before >power_supply_unregister() call. >Not sure if it should be within struct acpi_battery, perhaps we could >have it as a 'global' battery lock. Anyway, here it is: I think it should be within struct acpi_battery. There maybe one or more batteries. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
