On Tuesday 01 March 2011 18:03:23 Moore, Robert wrote:
> - there seem to be another problem in the acpica resource handling
> depths if _CRS functions do not return anything.
>
>
> Strictly speaking it's illegal for _CRS to not return anything.
> Practically, perhaps we should repair this case to a "NULL" resource
> descriptor which perhaps could be defined as a resource descriptor
> with a single End Tag descriptor.
Be aware that this was an early BIOS.
I am fine if there is an error message if this is not allowed.
It's the first time I saw such a message and an empty resource func.
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
