On Wednesday, January 12, 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/12/11 12:05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 12, 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 01/12/11 10:40, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:39:19 +0100 Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 01/12/2011 11:19 AM, Len Brown wrote:
> >>>>> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static inline int suspend_nvs_register(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> static inline int suspend_nvs_alloc(void) { return 0; }
> >>>>> static inline void suspend_nvs_free(void) {}
> >>>>> -static inline void suspend_nvs_save(void) {}
> >>>>> +static inline int suspend_nvs_save(void) {}
> >>>>
> >>>> Aiee, I've just noticed, this needs to return something, otherwise a
> >>>> warning is generated for !CONFIG_SUSPEND_NVS.
> >>>>
> >>>> What's better for you, a followup or resend?
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, I just made a patch for that, but I'll leave it up to
> >>> you and Len to haggle about.
> >
> > We're removing CONFIG_SUSPEND_NVS in one of the later patches, but please send
> > the fix if it's still necessary after applying the entire series.
>
> Build fails in linux-next of 2011-0112. Does that have the entire series
> applied?
Not sure, what does it print?
> >> Not that Len cares, but there is also this build error when
> >> ACPI is not enabled:
> >>
> >> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:734: error:implicit declaration of function 'suspend_nvs_register'
> >>
> >>
> >> I also have a patch for it.
> >
> > Please submit it.
>
> Did that.
OK, got it, but I think a little different patch is needed. Will reply to
that message.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
