On Wednesday, January 12, 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/12/11 10:40, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:39:19 +0100 Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/12/2011 11:19 AM, Len Brown wrote:
> >>> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static inline int suspend_nvs_register(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
> >>> }
> >>> static inline int suspend_nvs_alloc(void) { return 0; }
> >>> static inline void suspend_nvs_free(void) {}
> >>> -static inline void suspend_nvs_save(void) {}
> >>> +static inline int suspend_nvs_save(void) {}
> >>
> >> Aiee, I've just noticed, this needs to return something, otherwise a
> >> warning is generated for !CONFIG_SUSPEND_NVS.
> >>
> >> What's better for you, a followup or resend?
> >
> > Yeah, I just made a patch for that, but I'll leave it up to
> > you and Len to haggle about.
We're removing CONFIG_SUSPEND_NVS in one of the later patches, but please send
the fix if it's still necessary after applying the entire series.
> Not that Len cares, but there is also this build error when
> ACPI is not enabled:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:734: error:implicit declaration of function 'suspend_nvs_register'
>
>
> I also have a patch for it.
Please submit it.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
