On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:39:19 +0100 Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 11:19 AM, Len Brown wrote:
> > @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static inline int suspend_nvs_register(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
> > }
> > static inline int suspend_nvs_alloc(void) { return 0; }
> > static inline void suspend_nvs_free(void) {}
> > -static inline void suspend_nvs_save(void) {}
> > +static inline int suspend_nvs_save(void) {}
>
> Aiee, I've just noticed, this needs to return something, otherwise a
> warning is generated for !CONFIG_SUSPEND_NVS.
>
> What's better for you, a followup or resend?
Yeah, I just made a patch for that, but I'll leave it up to
you and Len to haggle about.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
