On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:28 +0800, huang ying wrote: >> >> > Instead you present your work as a fait accompli, not a work in flux and >> > subject to change. You ask for it to be merged -- this does not come >> > across like a discussion, much less a request for co-operation. >> >> I heard about that LKML likes talk with code instead of idea. Am I wrong? > > No, its your presentation of said code that's wrong. > > You're missing the [RFC] tags and open questions in your Changelogs > like: EDAC could use it like so and so, does that sound acceptable > Mauro? Maybe. We can not talk with code without that tag? > There is no mention you actually did talk to Mauro and Tony and what its > outcome was. The main outcome is that we need a generic hardware error reporting interface, that can be used by all hardware error reporting mechanisms. Best Regards, Huang Ying -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
