On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 21:06 +0800, huang ying wrote: >> >> I lists the requirements and my solutions in my patch description of >> [1/2] and [2/2]. If you have any question, please let me know. > > Those talk about _your_ requirements, it does not touch upon any of the > concerns of the other parties, it doesn't even mention them beyond > listing their existence. They are welcome to talk about their requirement and opinion in the thread. > It also, very specifically, does not mention if you did talk to any of > those parties and what their thought on the matter was, nor does it ask > them about their opinion. Again opinion is welcome. I just want to talk with code. > Instead you present your work as a fait accompli, not a work in flux and > subject to change. You ask for it to be merged -- this does not come > across like a discussion, much less a request for co-operation. I heard about that LKML likes talk with code instead of idea. Am I wrong? Best Regards, Huang Ying -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
