patch 5 doesn't look quite right, because it leaves both #define ACPI_BITMASK_PCIEXP_WAKE_STATUS 0x4000 /* ACPI 3.0 */ and #define ACPI_BITMASK_PCIEXP_WAKE_DISABLE 0x4000 /* ACPI 3.0 */ in aclocal.h If we're going to re-name what the original patch did, then we should finsh the job and delete the original name, yes? thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
