On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 22:40 +0800, malattia@xxxxxxxx wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:06:47PM +0000, Lin Ming wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:49 +0800, malattia@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:49:24AM +0800, Lin Ming wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 06:07 +0800, malattia@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:27:20PM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote: > > > > > > If you'd like to get ambitious, run the ASLTS suite on the big-endian machines. > > > > > > > > > > I'll give it a go :) > > > > > Is the one found in the meego git repository what I should try? > > > > > > > > Or acpica git repository (git://git.moblin.org/acpica) > > > > > > > > acpica/tests/aslts > > > > > > For now I only ran "Do 0 aslts" and the results are not too bad. I cleaned > > > up the build logs a bit and here's the diff between sparc64 and x86_64: > > > > Good. Thanks! > > > > > > > > --- /proc/self/fd/11 2010-07-08 22:33:25.614802828 +0900 > > > +++ /proc/self/fd/13 2010-07-08 22:33:25.614802828 +0900 > > > @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ > > > -Linux smetana 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Mon Jun 21 16:31:11 UTC 2010 sparc64 GNU/Linux > > > +Linux caligola 2.6.34 #37 SMP PREEMPT Sat May 29 11:36:03 JST 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > > > Make-install all the provided test cases > > > +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/nopt/32 > > > +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/nopt/64 > > > +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/opt/32 > > > +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/opt/64 > > > ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 78 lines, 1734433 bytes, 21705 keywords > > > AML Output: bdemo.aml - 282587 bytes, 4188 named objects, 17517 executable opcodes > > > > > > @@ -90,11 +94,11 @@ > > > > > > Compilation complete. 0 Errors, 83 Warnings, 18 Remarks, 0 Optimizations > > > ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 62 lines, 962044 bytes, 20265 keywords > > > -AML Output: oconst.aml - 255557 bytes, 862 named objects, 19403 executable opcodes > > > +AML Output: oconst.aml - 255575 bytes, 862 named objects, 19403 executable opcodes > > > > Why do the aml files have different size? > > Is it caused by big/small endian? > > They should be identical, possibly my patch is incomplete or not > correct. Out of the ~180 tests only the ones in the diff show > differences. > I'll have to check what is wrong on sparc64 for them. Hi, Did you find out why they are different? You can disassemble the aml files and see what the differences are. Thanks, Lin Ming > > ... > > > +AML Output: oconst.aml - 261272 bytes, 862 named objects, 19403 executable opcodes > > > +AML Output: dynobj.aml - 57916 bytes, 599 named objects, 4286 executable opcodes > > > +AML Output: dynobj.aml - 57920 bytes, 599 named objects, 4286 executable opcodes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
