On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 10:06:47PM +0000, Lin Ming wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:49 +0800, malattia@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:49:24AM +0800, Lin Ming wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 06:07 +0800, malattia@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 12:27:20PM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote: > > > > > If you'd like to get ambitious, run the ASLTS suite on the big-endian machines. > > > > > > > > I'll give it a go :) > > > > Is the one found in the meego git repository what I should try? > > > > > > Or acpica git repository (git://git.moblin.org/acpica) > > > > > > acpica/tests/aslts > > > > For now I only ran "Do 0 aslts" and the results are not too bad. I cleaned > > up the build logs a bit and here's the diff between sparc64 and x86_64: > > Good. Thanks! > > > > > --- /proc/self/fd/11 2010-07-08 22:33:25.614802828 +0900 > > +++ /proc/self/fd/13 2010-07-08 22:33:25.614802828 +0900 > > @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@ > > -Linux smetana 2.6.26-2-sparc64-smp #1 SMP Mon Jun 21 16:31:11 UTC 2010 sparc64 GNU/Linux > > +Linux caligola 2.6.34 #37 SMP PREEMPT Sat May 29 11:36:03 JST 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > Make-install all the provided test cases > > +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/nopt/32 > > +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/nopt/64 > > +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/opt/32 > > +install -d -m 775 ../../../../../../tmp/aml/20100528/opt/64 > > ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 78 lines, 1734433 bytes, 21705 keywords > > AML Output: bdemo.aml - 282587 bytes, 4188 named objects, 17517 executable opcodes > > > > @@ -90,11 +94,11 @@ > > > > Compilation complete. 0 Errors, 83 Warnings, 18 Remarks, 0 Optimizations > > ASL Input: MAIN.asl - 62 lines, 962044 bytes, 20265 keywords > > -AML Output: oconst.aml - 255557 bytes, 862 named objects, 19403 executable opcodes > > +AML Output: oconst.aml - 255575 bytes, 862 named objects, 19403 executable opcodes > > Why do the aml files have different size? > Is it caused by big/small endian? They should be identical, possibly my patch is incomplete or not correct. Out of the ~180 tests only the ones in the diff show differences. I'll have to check what is wrong on sparc64 for them. ... > > +AML Output: oconst.aml - 261272 bytes, 862 named objects, 19403 executable opcodes > > +AML Output: dynobj.aml - 57916 bytes, 599 named objects, 4286 executable opcodes > > +AML Output: dynobj.aml - 57920 bytes, 599 named objects, 4286 executable opcodes -- mattia :wq! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
