On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:18:46AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > I think this is a good idea. But it makes me a little bit nervous > to change addresses supplied by the firmware without any user-visible > indication at all. Is it worth doing a WARN_ONCE() sort of thing > when we truncate? That doesn't seem unreasonable, but do we have anything equivalent to that in the acpica code right now? > I know you experimented quite a bit to confirm that Windows does this > sort of masking. Do you have any notes about that experimentation > that would be useful to add to the bugzilla? Sure. I'll do that. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
