> Also, I think we could push the year even more up, say, to 2009. On the > assumption that such new hardware which can't do BOOT_KBD is only being > produced now (late 2009). Better err on the safe side? I'd prefer sticking with 2006 so we don't need a white-list for brand-new machines. Indeed, I think that 2006 is already conservative, and I'd be willing to debug failures on machines back as far as 2003. thanks, -Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
