On Thursday 24 December 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. Hi, > I built the async branch of your tree and tested it, also running > 2.6.33-rc1 + TuxOnIce for comparison. Dmesg for both are attached. Is > there anything I can/should be doing for you on top of this? No, thanks a lot. > I'll try Dmitry's patch on top of this a little later - other things to do first. No need for that, the patchset contains an equivalent of the Dmitry's patch. > I noticed that you were doing standard deviations in your stats - how > many runs were you basing them on? I usually run 10 iterations of suspend-resume for each configuration. The raw data are at http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/data/async-suspend-updated.pdf if you're interested. > Not sure that I can be bothered to do too many - too much else to do! Sure, thanks a lot anyway. Your data confirn that there's a measurable gain from suspending and resuming devices asynchronously. Have a merry Christmas and happy new year, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
