Hi. Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 18:25 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> I'm not sure what the next step should be at this point. To me, the picture is >>> quite clear now, but perhaps we ought to run more tests on some other machines >>> or something. Please let me know what you think. >> Looks great. If you do decide you want other machines tested, I'll >> happily try the machines around here: >> >> - Dell M1530 >> - Omnibook XE3-GF. >> - Via LN10000 based Mythtv Box >> - Desktop machine - Some Intel-based mobo I've forgotten the name of. >> >> I've been quietly following the thread, but have lost track of what >> iteration of the patch you're on, so if you'd give me a pointer to it, >> I'd be grateful. >> >> By the way, I haven't forgotten about sending some real patches for >> swsusp (ie more than just cleanups). I'm just busy with other things and >> also thinking carefully about what order to do things in. > > I vote for ability to save all ram to the disk. > After several days of testing I managed to make my system do s2disk > really reliable (~300 cycles tested), but suspending when memory is > tight still fails sometimes. > > I didn't yet use your tuxonice system though. Well, I want to and intend on working towards merging as much of TuxOnIce as people will allow in, but it will take a long time because there are so many modifications to do, I don't have that much time to work on it, am splitting the time I do have and am still have a couple of new features I want to do to TuxOnIce. Regards, Nigel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
