On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 18:25 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I'm not sure what the next step should be at this point. To me, the picture is > > quite clear now, but perhaps we ought to run more tests on some other machines > > or something. Please let me know what you think. > > Looks great. If you do decide you want other machines tested, I'll > happily try the machines around here: > > - Dell M1530 > - Omnibook XE3-GF. > - Via LN10000 based Mythtv Box > - Desktop machine - Some Intel-based mobo I've forgotten the name of. > > I've been quietly following the thread, but have lost track of what > iteration of the patch you're on, so if you'd give me a pointer to it, > I'd be grateful. > > By the way, I haven't forgotten about sending some real patches for > swsusp (ie more than just cleanups). I'm just busy with other things and > also thinking carefully about what order to do things in. I vote for ability to save all ram to the disk. After several days of testing I managed to make my system do s2disk really reliable (~300 cycles tested), but suspending when memory is tight still fails sometimes. I didn't yet use your tuxonice system though. Best regards, Maxim Levisky -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
