Re: Async resume patch (was: Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> The wait queue plus the op_complete flag combo plays the role of the locking
> in the Linus' picture

Please just use the lock. Don't make up your own locking crap. Really. 

Your patch is horrible. Exactly because your locking is horribly 
mis-designed. You can't say things are complete from an interrupt, for 
example, since you made it some random bitfield, which has unknown 
characteristics (ie non-atomic read-modify-write etc).

The fact is, any time anybody makes up a new locking mechanism, THEY 
ALWAYS GET IT WRONG. Don't do it.

I suggested using the rwsem locking for a good reason. It made sense. It 
was simpler. Just do it that way, stop making up crap.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux