On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > However, the parent can be on a different bus type than the children, so it > looks like we can only start the asynchronous path at the core level. Agreed. > > Unless you want to do _all_ of the async logic in generic code and > > re-introduce the "dev->async_suspend" flag. > > Quite frankly, I would like to. > > > I would be ok with that now that the infrastructure seems so simple. > > Well, perhaps I should dig out my original async suspend/resume patches > that didn't contain all of the non-essential stuff and post them here for > discussion, after all ... That seems like a very good idea. IIRC they were quite similar to what we have been discussing. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
