Re: eeepc-laptop: bugreport

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 09:26:23PM +0100, andrej.gelenberg@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> The eepc-latop-rfkill should be hard block. If the LED is not on,
>> my wlan-card won't transmit. The eeepc-laptop is only driver
>> which use hotplug-subsystem to hide the hardware.
>
> No. The *hardware* disables the PCI device, at which point all reads
> return errors and drivers fall over. The eeepc-laptop driver then hides
> the device because it's no longer there.
>
> Now, it's entirely possible that this behaviour is no longer present on
> the 1005h. That's fine, and it necessitates changing the behaviour of
> the driver. But it's not a reason for removing the functionality
> entirely, because the 700s, 900s and earlier 1000 series *do* require
> that PCI hotplugging be peformed.
>
> (Well. There's a separate situation where the PCI runtime power
> management code is going to interfere with the way eeepc-laptop does
> things, and this functionality is going to need to be added to the PCI
> core and removed from eeepc-laptop)

Matthew, do you think that we could skip the hotplug code when all
rfkill notifier (_SB.PCI0.P0P[5,6,7]) fail to register ?

This should work at least for 1005ha.

-- 
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux