Re: multiple APIC/MADT found

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:40:18AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Friday 13 November 2009 06:38:38 am Fred Labrosse wrote:
> > So I did that (acpi_apic_instance=2) and that did give me 2 processors.  
> > Which is definitely better, hence my email to the suggested address.
> 
> I think we need a DMI or similar mechanism to do this automatically,
> so you don't need to use "acpi_apic_instance=2" every time you boot.
> Can you open a bug report at http://bugzilla.kernel.org, attach the
> output of dmidecode, and post the bug URL here?

Ugh. Can we at least take a look at the differences and try to work out 
why one works? I hate to keep making this point, but Windows doesn't 
use whitelisting or blacklisting to any significant extent on modern 
hardware. If it's booting properly and we're not, then it's because 
we're doing something wrong.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux