On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 22:28 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> That doesn't seem too positive. Or at least there's no indication that >> somebody will pick it up. > > I'd re-submit with a better description of the patch. You should always > try to describe what your doing as accurately as possible so the > maintainer doesn't have to work very hard to know what your doing. There's nothing to add. It's a patch to cleanup the coding style, that's it. > That > particular patch just has a one liner description that wasn't very > informative .. Either that or re-submit your series without that patch > if you don't have confidence in it. All of my patches have been picked up, except the ones for ACPI. I haven't received a single comment from them, which would explain the current state of the code. If somebody raised the hand and said; I'll merge this, please resend, I'd do that, otherwise I think it's a waste of time. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
